A review by Danzil Monk Sr.
Note: I am a former member of the P.A.W.
I was saved and spiritually raised in a P.A.W. Church in the New York State & Ontario District Council, (as it was called back then).
I held several state offices including VP of the state Young people, Program Chairman of the State young People, state Brotherhood Secretary, the State Alter worker committee member, and was the recipient of the President’s president award of the state Young people.
When I moved away, I left in good standing and remained in contact with, and continued to teach and preach for my then pastor. In fact, I preached the last sermon my pastor heard, my daughter was the last child she blessed, and I was present when my pastor when on to her reward.
I also maintained a good name and reputation during my membership throughout New York State and beyond. I am still that person.
So I have no gripe or score to settle with the P.A.W.
I love and respect this great Christian organization.
The Panel session:
The Panel consisted of Dr. Jayne Morgan, Lillian Robertson, MD, Bishop R.E. Hairston Psy. D, and Presiding Bishop Theodor L. Brooks.
Dr. Jayne Morgan, M.D. who is the main speaker of this session, is Executive Director of the Covid Task Force and On-Air Medical Expert Kennesaw, Georgia, United States.
In other words, she is an official representative of the government and the medical community, and her allegiance clearly is with their agenda.
During his introduction, Bishop Brooks said that this session was to provide the viewers with information about what they should do. It was an effort to provide people with reliable answers.
Which means the information should be reliable, accurate, dependable, and honest.
At 17:14 Lillian Robertson said it would be an effort to get the right information out to counter the misinformation and disinformation.
Since that is their stated goal, that is what I will be gaging in my review.
At the 18-minute point Lillian Robertson asked Dr. Jayne Morgan, the apparent resident expert, “where are they in terms of the science”, the vaccinations, clinical trials etc. (18:15-27)
Dr. Jayne Morgan, (18:30) clearly a pro-Covid Vaccine advocate, talked about the supposed prior three- what she called “surges”, and said that the current surge is the only one that was preventable because we had the vaccines. This comment is clear evidence that she is drawing from the Vaccine makers, and the establishment who blindly follow them. She is relying on their playbook and not the universally established medical protocol that had been the standard for treating Covid viruses, and the basic protocol of doctor actions on behalf of their patients.
The fact is that the first serge was preventable. Had the medical professionals around the world did what they were trained to do, and what standard medical protocol called for, the covid spread could have been stopped. As explained by Dr. Peter McCullough, But instead, they allowed the WHO, the CDC and the FDA, and God knows who else, to dictate to them how to respond, and their instructions were to do nothing other than what these groups determined was appropriate. And these groups were motivated by money, not saving lives. This is clear from their promotion of a Covid vaccine which would profit them all, instead of applying the many known effective medicines, and sending out a constant call for use of vitamin C, D, Zinc and other nutritional aids to strengthen human immune systems.
Since there were several courageous doctors who did follow the proper protocol and were able to save lives very early on, there was no need for the many lost lives, had the medical professionals not followed the bad commands coming down from the WHO, CDC and FDA telling them not to treat the covid sick with any treatments that were not approved by them. And their approved dangerous treatments like ventilators and remdesivir that were reported to have killed many of them. Dr. Morgan said nothing about any of this, and no doubt is unaware of it if she is relying on the CDC, FDA, major media, and big pharma for her information. That is why this kind of panel is useless if it does not include the other side being represented. It is not even balanced “science” if both sides cannot be heard.
Dr. Morgan hyped on the problem of some of the incoming patients being anti-science and anti-covid-“vaccine”, when they are in a hospital that is a monolith to science. She spoke as if there is only one perspective of the science concerning Covid and how to treat it. She called it a dichotomy.
She described this “fourth surge” as a surge of misinformation. She claimed the first three surges were spent trying to provide education and information and in this fourth surge we have to combat misinformation and disinformation. And it is discouraging and disquieting. (This should be remembered as we evaluate her presented information).
At 21:11 she continued by addressing the question of herd immunity. And she agreed that we could reach herd immunity without the vaccines, but not without unnecessary death and suffering.
I find it interesting that she would address natural herd immunity without addressing the fact that most deaths were due to poor health, and that an extremely large number of people were claimed to have died of covid because of the financial incentives given to hospitals to claim patients as covid patients, and that many were falsely claimed to have covid because of a bad PCR test that knowingly gave false positive results. As pointed out by Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon at the 11min. point of his video.
Additionally, there was no effort to gage how many people had and got past covid and did not need a vaccine or why? Because they want everyone to take the shot. Even if you have immunity. The insane push for total vaccination is ignored by her and the rest of the panel. Why? What she was doing, is what the government, big pharma, social media and major media, and medical institutions and universities are doing. Preaching the covid vaccine is the only hope gospel. And ignoring the science that says otherwise.
I was curious if she would address the content of the vaccines, the trial tests in animals that were killed by the efforts to make a covid vaccine which they gave up on because they could not develop a safe one, but the sudden “success” of a safe Covid “vaccine” appears once governments were convinced to pour billions into the production of them, the horrible disinformation about the safety of the covid shots, the actual number of people who died from covid and their prior medical conditions of morbidity that actually contributed to their deaths, the false reporting to cause fear and panic to get people to take the shot, etc. All promoted by the above mentions sources.
She said we have science to move us forward in a healthy manner, but again, she is one sided and clearly bias against any evidence to the contrary of her Covid vaccine view.
At 22:43 She slights the reports coming out of Israel saying that the vaccinated were more likely to be admitted to the hospitals than the naturally infected. She rejected it because she said it was not a research effort but an “observational study. It cannot be substantiated. But if substantiation of data is so important, why is she so willing to not only believe, but repeat unsubstantiated claims like the number of people who died of Covid, the claims that very few died or are made extremely sick from the covid shots, that there is nothing harmful in the covid shots, (when the total content is not available), that a combination of cheap known medicines cannot protect from or heal covid sick, etc. It is hypocrisy to say the least.
She says that only reproducible studies are useful and credible. If so, then why is she not paying attention to the reproducible studies that demonstrated the dangers of the covid vaccines? It shows that a extremely large number of people are getting sick and dying from the Covid shots (some 4 to 6 thousand to date and that is known to be extremely under reported), and not from alternative treatments. In the past, if 50 people got sick and died, the trial was stopped. Why is that not being observed now?
At 24:23 she said that the observational study, did not mention that the unvaccinated group that had natural immunity, had a section that died. But she stopped short of addressing why they died. No doubt they died because they were unhealthy and had other comorbidities. You see, so she also did not mention the full matter. And this is often the issue with their side. They strive very hard to keep any information from the public that will go against their efforts to Covid shoot everyone.
At 26:26 she addressed the VAERS and says that it is a raw data bank, and that it alone cannot be trusted for accurate information on deaths, because anyone can report on it and it has to be what she calls “scrubbed”. But she never addresses who does the scrubbing and their allegiance. Many of the “Scrubbers” if they are establishment medical professionals who do the bidding of the CDC, FDA and pro-covid shot government, you can’t expect them to tell the truth or to honestly “scrub” the data. Additionally, she neglected to state just how much detail the VAERS system requires, which is why it is generally done by the patient’s physician or medical professional connected to the patient or case, which makes the raw reporting much more reliable than she falsely indicated. But she gave that false impression because she knew the bad things the VAERS system reports on the effects of the covid shots. Nor did she acknowledge that the law requires doctors to report their patient’s reactions to Vaccine shots on VAERS, but it is not being enforced.
At 28:24 she says we are fighting a pandemic of ideology and idolatry, claiming by inference that those of us who do not toe the line of their “YOU MUST TRUST THE COVID SHOTS” mantra, are unable to think rationally and to reason. This is insulting and sick. But it is necessary for them to say such things, putting us in the same category of those who actually-are incapable of rational reason. It solves all kinds of problems for them to do this. Namely, it allows them the illusion of having a justifiable reason not to meat us in the public square to openly debate the science and issues. Because to do so would force them to admit their lies or to have to either directly address issues they know they can’t if they want to maintain the deception or be seen clearly dodging rebuttals, avoiding questions, or look foolish as they repeat claims and accusations with no rebuttal to intelligent arguments and respected sources references.
Not one word was said by her acknowledging that there are many medical professionals who are on the other side of this issue and “science”. She intentionally gives the impression that true science and true medical professionals are on her side of this issue.
The P.A.W. presiding bishop Brooks, praised Dr. Morgan’s introduction with no objections, (he was a sheep to the slaughter).
He said the media was duping us into thinking a certain way. But he must not realize that the vast majority of major media is pumping his view not ours. So he was correct, only he was the one being duped.
At 30:41 Dr. Morgan replies again that she is not a fan to “do your own research” because most people are not capable of understanding what they read. They don’t have the education, credentials, or experience to do their own research. People can use scientific terms that sound official, but when a scientist reads them, the sentence is nonsensical. She said it is intentionally written to mislead people. It is a misuse of scientific language.
Sadly, her comment disrespects the many people who are in fact intelligent enough to either understand the material themselves, or to consult trusted medical and scientific professionals who they can ask to help with understanding the material.
For her to dismiss this group of people as if they are not relevant is just rude.
Additionally, she ignores the fact that there are many medical professionals on the other side of her perspectives and convictions about the Covid shots, who are reporting on the material and data, and doing so in a language that the laymen can understand. So much for her “I am not a fan of do your own research”.
At 31:19 Lillian Robertson, voiced her agreement by saying that the “idolatry” that Dr. Morgan earlier claimed was being practiced by anti-Covid vaxers, has led to the politicization of this pandemic.
This is strange, since it was the media, the government and the CDC, FDA, Big Pharma, and social media that created the politicization of this crisis. To blame it on ignorant people who worship ignorance and false information is not only wrong, but condescending and cruel.
She also marveled at the distrust of the hospitals by many people since the hospitals have always been the system that serves their medical needs in the past. But she seems to ignore the fact that medical malpractice and science fraud has also been long with us and well reported, even if under reported in the major media. So, to act as if they are white as their coats in purity is dishonest. Given the mass malpractice of how they were told to handle Covid patients early on and the deaths that resulted, as pointed out by Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Mike Yeadon, there is good reason not to trust the hospitals. So, Morgan and Robetson’s blatant disrespect for the ability of people to be able to think and make wise decisions about their medical treatment is striking.
Robertson then foolishly tried to compare it to our ignorance of the ingredients in Tylenol, insulin and blood pressure meds, yet we trust them.
Yes, but those have been used successfully for years and have been tried and proven safe, with no long-term side effects. The Covid shots are not the same thing.
She lied and said the same process used for those items were used for the Covid shots, and that is a bold face lie. The Covd “vaccines” were rushed through to acceptance via the emergency act.
Dr. Morgan at 33:31 came back with yet another attack on the people who she described as “anti-science” and “covid does not exist” (as in there is no virus at all) people, and attacked them as if we are all in that category, pointing out that when such people get sick, the medical professionals in the hospitals have to care for them at the risk of their own lives.
And worst, she claims that 95 percent of the sick of Covid in the hospitals are unvaccinated.
Where she draws her statistics from, and how she even knows that statistic is reliable, is not stated or addressed. Apparently in her mind, the verifiable data for the ACTUAL percentage of covid sick in the hospital is not important.
She continued by saying that such people expect doctors to live up to their Hippocratic oath, and they would do that.
But I would ask, isn’t that oath that you will do no harm? Is not insisting on the wrong treatment that does more damage than good, doing harm, and a violation of the oath?
She said that true believers in anti-science would not go to the hospital. And some on the panel laughed.
And Bishop Hairston said it was hypocrisy.
Note their condescending attitude, because people who do not trust the claims of the establishment, that the experimental Covid shots are safe, still go to the hospital when they are sick, that is hypocritical?
Since when is total trust in doctors necessary for going to the hospital?
Are they suggesting that there is no such thing as medical malpractice? And there is no cause for concern about how doctors treat patients? Really?
And still, none of them have addressed the intelligent, the medical professionals, and the scientists who are on the other side of this covid issue, and it is already 36 minutes into the session.
At 35:30 Bishop Brooks asked about mandated Covid shots for medical staff who do not want to take the covid shots. Now notice, these are not science deniers, or covid virus deniers. They do have the ability to research and to understand the information correctly. Let’s see how Dr. Morgan replies to them.
Lillian Robertson, first answered, saying it is disheartening to have to deal with that attitude when they are over worked and have to deal with that kind of rejection when there is a vaccine that can help. She said - but they receive it when they are admitted into the hospital. If you don’t trust the science, why do you go to the hospital?
Clearly, she did not answer the question, and she is an intelligent medical professional who can understand. So, the Bishop asked her again about the coworkers at the hospital who do not want to take the shot. She said that their governor had mandated that they will have to if they want to work in a hospital. Again, no comment on their intelligence, or ability to understand the science, or their reasons for not wanting to take it. And he did not press her on this, Why? She chose to focus on the problem of under staffing it will cause.
At 38:46 Dr. Morgan then commented that hospitals have a higher standard, to ensure a safe environment, you should not have to be concerned about catching a disease in the hospital.
We should be demonstrating science by our actions. Think about the patients who must worry about medical staff who are not vaccinated. We owe these people a safe environment. She says if you can’t practice science, maybe this isn’t for you.
The Presiding Bishop Brooks was again blown away by “the great” Dr. Morgan. He gave no objections or press for explanation as to why the medical staff would refuse the Covid shots.
Nor did he seem to catch the fact that even vaccinated people can give uninfected people Covid. So why are they not an issue? Could he be suffering from idolatry towards the Covid “Vaccine”?
He is the leader of a large Holiness Christian denomination that preaches and teaches against lying, deception and misleading people, and yet he swallows everything she said, hook line and sinker, without inquiring about the other side of the top brass medical professionals that disagree. He did not even have enough consideration to have them represented here.
What is not said, is that these medical staffers can understand the science and the research, and yet they have reservations about the shot.
What is also not addressed is that vaccinated staff can still catch and transmit covid to others, including patients. So why is the vaccine being pushed as a protection from Covid? The science says that the covid vaccines do not prevent or protect from Covid. But they keep claiming that they give better protecting from covid then not being vaccinated. Because if you catch it, it will not be as bad. But who decides this? On what actual evidence, and from who is this based on? The CDC?, the FDA? Both organizations are invested in the Covid Vaccines? Why should they be trusted to tell the truth about this?
At the 40:21 point Bishop Hairston turned the focus to safety precautions.
Dr. Morgan got into the issue of variants and as expected referenced the director of the CDC’s Rochelle P Walensky’s comments about the delta variant saying it was a “viral load that was one thousand, two hundred times higher than the previous variant”.
She made no effort to address how the director knew this for a fact, no mention of the research that determined it, or who the director was relying on to substantiate that claim. And she did not mention that there was research that stated that the delta variant while more contagious, was not as potent, or harmful as previous versions. As reported by Dr. Chris Martenson. That is not important because it does not help the “all must be vaccinated the vaccine is our only hope” narrative.
And while she finally admits that the vaccines could not protect the vaccinated from spreading the delta variant, she leaves out entirely the underlining cause for the rise of such variants. Namely, the effort to make Vaccines the frontline defense rather than natural immunity and alternate medicine to protect and strengthen people from and with covid. She LEFT OUT THE FACT that natural immunity protects from variants when vaccines, if at all a protection, only protects against the virus it was created to fight.
She totally downplayed the power of natural immunity, and harped on vaccinations as the solution while admitting the weakening ability of the vaccines. Yet she claimed they still protected against serious covid sickness. But not once did she state what her evidence was for her “data”. She was repeating the mantra, as If she too was an idol worshiper of THE COVID VACCINE NECESSITY, and could see no other solution.
She lied and said the unvaccinated are the threat because the variants are developing in the unvaccinated, not the vaccinated. (45:00-42) But Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology, says that the more people you vaccinate, the greater number of vaccine mutations you are likely to get. He said the best policy is to only vaccinate the most vulnerable, this would limit the amount of mutations. (Washington Times audio Biden team’s misguided and deadly Covid -19 vaccine strategy). (4 minute point)
For those who prefer to read, this is what they said:
Dr. Robert Malone and Peter Navarro:
“The Biden administration’s strategy to universally vaccinate in the middle of the pandemic is bad science and badly needs a reboot.
This strategy will likely prolong the most dangerous phase of the worst pandemic since 1918 and almost assuredly cause more harm than good – even as it undermines faith in the entire public health system.
Four flawed assumptions drive the Biden strategy. The first is that universal vaccination can eradicate the virus and secure economic recovery by achieving herd immunity throughout the country (and the world). However, the virus is now so deeply embedded in the world population that, unlike polio and smallpox, eradication is unachievable. SARS-CoV-2 and its myriad mutations will likely continually circulate, much like the common cold and influenza.”
“The most important reason why a universal vaccination strategy is imprudent tracks to the collective risk associated with how the virus responds when replicating in vaccinated individuals. Here, basic virology and evolutionary genetics tell us the goal of any virus is to infect and replicate in as many people as possible. A virus can’t efficiently spread if, like with Ebola, it quickly kills its hosts.
The clear historical tendency for viruses crossing over from one species to another is to evolve in a way that makes them both more infectious and less pathogenic over time. However, a universal vaccination policy deployed in the middle of a pandemic can turn this normal Darwinian taming process into a dangerous vaccine arms race.
The essence of this arms race is this: The more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get, the less durable the vaccines will become, ever more powerful vaccines will have to be developed, and individuals will be exposed to more and more risk.
Science tells us here that today’s vaccines, which use novel gene therapy technologies, generate powerful antigens that direct the immune system to attack specific components of the virus. Thus, when the virus infects a person with a “leaky” vaccination, the viral progeny will be selected to escape or resist the effects of the vaccine.
If the entire population has been trained via a universal vaccination strategy to have the same basic immune response, then once a viral escape mutant is selected, it will rapidly spread through the entire population – whether vaccinated or not.
A far more optimal strategy is to vaccinate only the most vulnerable. This will limit the amount of vaccine-resistant mutations and thereby slow, if not halt, the current vaccine arms race.
Fortunately, those most vulnerable represent a relatively small number; and these cohorts have already achieved high levels of vaccine acceptance. They include senior citizens, for whom the risk of serious disease or death increases exponentially with age, and those with significant comorbidities such as obesity, lung, and heart disease.
For much of the rest of the population, there’s nothing to fear but fear of the virus itself. This is particularly true if we have lawful outpatient access to a growing arsenal of scientifically proven prophylactics and therapeutics.
For example, there has been much controversy over ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Yet, with the emergence of a growing body of scientific evidence, we can be assured these two medicines are safe and effective in prophylaxis and early treatment when administered under a physician’s supervision. Numerous other useful treatments range from famotidine/celecoxib, fluvoxamine, and apixaban to various anti-inflammatory steroids, Vitamin D, and zinc.
The broader goal when administering these agents is to moderate symptoms and take death off the table, particularly for the unvaccinated. Unlike vaccines, these agents are generally not dependent on specific viral properties or mutations but instead mitigate or treat the inflammatory symptoms of the disease itself. (Pfizer is now actively marketing its own antiviral therapeutic – tacit admission Pfizer’s own vaccine is incapable of eradicating the virus.)
We are not “anti-vax.” One of us (Dr. Malone) invented the core mRNA technology being used by Pfizer and Moderna to produce their vaccines and has spent his entire professional career developing and advancing novel vaccine technologies, vaccines, and other medical countermeasures. The other (Mr. Navarro) played a key role at the Trump White House in jumpstarting Operation Warp Speed and ensuring timely delivery of the vaccines.
We are simply saying that just because you have a big vaccine hammer, it is not necessarily wise to use it for every nail. The American people deserve better than a universal vaccination strategy under the flag of bad science and enforced through authoritarian measures.
• Dr. Robert Malone is the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and the inventor of mRNA vaccines while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988. Peter Navarro served in the Trump White House as the Defense Production Act Policy Coordinator.”
So, Dr. Morgan is incorrect when she says that vaccinating everyone is the answer, and that it is the unvaccinated that poses the great threat. It is the vaccinated that gives the virus the ability to mutate.
This is why Morgan and Robertson will not discuss those arguments of the “medical professionals” on the other side of the issue. To do so would expose the weakness of their high-sounding presentation.
She has so much to say about the science, but she either did not know or lied about the science to push her view. Yet she accused us of being the ones holding up progress. Sad.
Additionally, did you notice what Dr. Malone and Peter Navarro said about alternative treatments and vitamins? Is it not strange that Morgan and Robertson said nothing about these in their entire session?
She then claimed that the shut down for 90 days was recommended by scientists because it would have killed off the virus. That was not necessary since we had medicine that treated it and were misinformed not to use them, so that the Vaccines could be rushed through. Scientists did that too.
Their lies about the proper treatments for Covid is what caused the spread and the deaths. Yet she said nothing about this. She is indeed an idol worshiper of Covid vaccines, and blind to the plot.
The virus would have continued in people because total shut down was not possible in human society of billions. It is foolish to think it was a wise call. We quarantine the Weak and sickly and old, not the healthy. You know this and yet you pretend that you are delivering the best science for this crisis.
She made light of our demand for freedom during the efforts to force a shut down and asked, “how free do we feel”, as if our unwillingness to be locked down is the reason for our current state. What disrespect for our intelligence?
Bishop Brooks was just elated and tickled by her “brilliance” and Lillian smiled from cheek to cheek, as Dr. Morgan pontificated and rattled off the Covid “Vaccine” is the only answer narrative.
Both bishops commended Dr. Morgan for her “preaching” and said they should give her a minister’s license. Bishop Brooks said he would sign it.
How sad that these holy men of God, cannot discern when they are being lied to. It seems that they too worshiped at the altar of science that day, and were not interested in asking the hard questions.
She said that the data from all hospitals and medical places everywhere are reporting that the vast majority of covid sick are the unvaccinated.
But what hospital, getting lots more money for labeling an incoming patient “covid infected”, and seeking to maintain favor with those who fund them, would report that most on their covid patients were vaccinated, against the narrative of their financial backers? Why this is not considered as a valid issue, is frighteningly disturbing.
At 49:20 Dr. Morgan said that Covid Vaccine hesitancy is not based on reason but an ideology.
That is disrespectful and condescending. This is the voice of medical arrogance. Notice that she includes medical professionals who are intelligent, and knowledgeable of the science and research in that “ideology not reason” group. Since she never does separate them.
She blamed the need for booster shots on the unvaccinated. Because the unvaccinated are the cause of the variants, totally ignoring the medical and scientific evidence that points to the vaccinated as the cause of the variants, as discussed above.
She said that when talking to these people, there is not a response to rational data and rational information, who are at her talks not to get helpful information, but to disrupt.
This may be why she is so bent on painting all Covid shot rejecters with her wide brush.
She was agitated by hecklers. But as a professional, she should be more reliable and stable, not offended, vindictive and resentful because of it.
I must insist that she refer me to the type of people that she has been talking to. I am not a PhD medical professional, and yet I have been able to talk to many RATIONAL people who referred me to RATIONAL INFORMATION. So, is she admitting that irrational unreasonable people are the only type she has been in contact with?
At the 50:50 minute point-She claim that those who make an idol of the "anti -Covid vaxx" view are worshiping those who share their view and should go to them for help. She claims she is a Christian and did not believe in worshiping idols, yet she seems to be guilty of what she so willingly accused us of. She seems to worship at the alter of the CDC, FDA, NIH, Fauci, Big Pharma, medical institutions, and government. And her failure to honestly, (if she is aware if the data) address the medical arguments on the other side by competent medical professionals, is unrighteous.
When asked if trusting science is idolatry, she said no. Why? Because science is not emotional. What?
She says that when she reads a science textbook, she does not come away with wonderful feelings. As if that determines that science cannot be worshipped. I know scientists who would strongly disagree with her. I have personally debated scientists who worshipped science and denied the existence of God.
She spent much of her time developing and addressing idea of a culture of anti-covid vaxx idolatry.
Embarrassingly, Bishop Brooks, who has been just giddy over all that Dr. Morgan has been saying, in a response to the question of science being worshipped, said that it was not worship, but trust in medical professions to treat medical issues like going to a dentist for a tooth issue. But he then said if you don’t want to take the covid vaccine, he was not going to criticize them, or put them down, you stay on your side and he will stay on his, a safe distance away from you. He said we need to stay in perspective and not go into left or tight field and amplify it and confuse the issue.
But Dr. Morgan, had just spent most of her time demonizing, judging and criticizing the unvaccinated as the main issue and cause of the Covid virus remaining a persistent problem. I don’t think he realized what his words did to her stated narrative.
At 55:30 Bishop Hairston asked Dr. Morgan if it would be safe for the P.A.W. to have their conventions of 4 or 5 thousand people, and she said no. The surge is due to failure to follow safety procedure. She claimed that the safest events are those that have “vaccine mandates”. Again, she is putting it all on vaccination. And here she backs the MANDATES. Nothing is said about human rights, the healthy being safe and how to build healthy immune systems, because she has fully brought into the pro-covid shot plot.
Bishop Brooks said he would follow the data on the out-break levels before deciding to have a convention on site. But he is relying on the same people who benefit financially from lying to the public and keeping the fear and crisis of Covid going.
To the question posted by a viewer that asked: “are we going to treat the unvaccinated like lepers, Bishop Brooks said no, but then rebuked the question as going off on the deep end, even though Dr. Morgan kept stressing the need for separating from the unvaccinated. It was an appropriate question, but it was not welcome because it forces them to address their irrational narrative. And that they did not want to do.
Dr. Morgan said we don’t treat them like lepers because unlike the lepers of the past, we have treatments. But she seems to forget that she pointed out that many people are not taking the “treatment” Covid shot, and so you are indeed advocating leper treatment. Earlier Bishop Brooks plainly said you stay on your side as an unvaccinated, and I will stay on my side safe as a vaccinated person. So why the hypocrisy?
Dr. Morgan recommended the questioner look at our hospitals and see how it is the unvaccinated who are there, being taken care of, not treated as lepers. That not only the unvaccinated covid sick are a problem, but they are a problem to those with other conditions who can’t get help and treatment because you non vaccinated are taking up the space. She said but think a bout the fact that you had a choice to get the "vaccine" and did not. (Bishop Brooks clapped as she spoke).
Dr. Morgan knows that the viewer was not talking about the hospitals, but our day to day involvement with people. But to stay focused on the point would be to incriminating, so she shifted to the hospitals.
Well Dr. Morgan, My wife had Covid for three weeks badly, in our home and I was not wearing a mask nor did I constantly wash things or ware gloves. I remained in close proximity to her and often breathed her air. Yet I did not get “Covid”. And she fully recovered. But then, there was no one around to fabricate the facts in our case. And my experience is not going to help your agenda.
Dr. Morgan said she liked what June summers Harris said: “Remember, wisdom, knowledge and understanding are among the seven spirits God placed into the land”
Yet Dr. Morgan has ignored and or rejected wisdom, knowledge and understanding that are being given by the medical professionals on the other side.
Bishop Brooks emphasized mask waring, as if mask were really effective.
Dr. Morgan also backed “masking” but never said anything about the harm of masks. Because she rejects that view no doubt. Even though the “Science” clearly supports the danger of masks over long periods of time. Common sense tells you that breathing in what you breath out is not health.
Nearing the end, Bishop Hairston asked Dr. Morgan about children vaccination. That children are dying of covid, is that true and she said yes. And it is sad.
But how does she even know if the rates are true? She said they make up about 25% of covid infected, but she never provided evidence. Nor did she address the fact of the many false positive of the PCR tests, or the exaggerated count being practiced by hospitals for money and or pleasing their financial backers.
She said “children do well” but WE ARE BEGINNING TO SEE long term syndromes, they are showing long term risks of enduring issues down the road if we don’t protect them. The “long-term effect they are beginning to see in children”? (Never stating the research, data or source), but hitting us with the “don’t you care about our children tactic”. She gave no reference as to what medical status of those children were besides covid. Or what evidence there was to determine if Children with other medical issues were being called or listed as Covid issues. Remember, the money incentive is still in operation. A hospital still gets lots more money when a child enters and is listed as a Covid patient, then they do for other sicknesses. None of this is addressed. Why? It has a direct bearing on the issue, and they know this. But it would interfere with their efforts and so it is ignored. But it is irrational and unreasonable, to pretend these issues are not relevant to this subject.
The utter avoidance and denial of all the points that I have raised here that were not mentioned, important factors that medical professionals who were concerned about us being informed about the “science” and the whole truth, would have included. Could it be an indication that Dr. Morgan and Lillian Robertson could be suffering from a form of idolatry of “establishment worship”, that will not permit them to think outside the “Covid Shots to all agenda”?
Could they be suffering from and inability to think rationally about what they are clearly avoiding and denying? You see, it can go both ways. If they are able to attribute to us, a psychosis of delusion, we can easily do the same for them. I think that we have more evidence to prove our case, than they do. Which is why they are not willing to have an open debate on these things. They prefer to pretend that there is no possibility of a nefarious agenda perpetrated by globalist. And that there are no other scientific or medical perspectives that are rational aside from theirs.
Not one time in this discussion was anything other than the Covid shots mentioned as a solution to Covid. Not even proper nutrition to strengthen our immune system. No discussion about, vitamin C, D, Zink, or Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or anything. Why? Was it just an over site? Or could it be that they were so dedicated to their idolatrous worship of the Covid shots that they could not bring themselves to even mention any such alternatives?
Nothing was said about the blacklisting of known, tried, tested and proven medications that were blocked, banned, and denounced by the CDC, FDA and other medical and governmental authorities, in order to justify the emergency status of the Covid shot production and distribution. Nothing was said about the lack of transparency.
Bishop Brooks said he was blessed by Dr. Jayne Morgan’s presentation and he asked to fund her appearance at a P.A.W. event, Bishop Hairston agreed. It is a tragedy of ignorant trust that is abused by disinformation and misinformation.
This panel is a good example as to why so many Christians think the way they do about those who have chosen not to receive the Covid “vaccination”. The high level of disinformation coming from Christian leaders, who in turn are accusing us of being the ones that are spreading disinformation, is causing the division in the body.
I have labored through this session because of my concern that so many leaders are so carelessly willing to look like they are on top of the best information, but they are not willing to actually do the research outside of their closed in perspective.
Rather, they trust the “experts” to tell them what to believe.
This has never been the policy of the P.A.W. to my knowledge. In the past we were taught to study, investigate, and make sure before we adopted a doctrine. That was good advice then, and it still is now.
For those interested in getting the perspective of the other side of the Covid Issue. I recommend "thehighwire.com"
For medical help and information on how to treat and or prevent harm from Covid.
https://frontlinemedicaldoctors.com/
For a great example of what happens when both sides are represented in the covid dialogue, watch this debate.
DEL BIGTREE’S HEATED DEBATE WITH TOP HEALTH OFFICIALS
ICAN CEO and host of The HighWire, Del Bigtree was invited on CGTN’s The Heat for a tense and, at times, explosive debate on Covid vaccination with two of America’s Top specialists, American Public Health Association Exec. Director, Georges C. Benjamin, and Chair & President of ACCESS Health Intl, William Haseltine. Del was joined in the debate by Undercover Epidemic Nurse author Erin Marie Olszewski. Source: https://www.cgtn.com/tv Air date: Aug. 12, 2021
My biblical reasons for taking the time to address this matter.
The Bible says:
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked bear rule, the people mourn." (Proverbs 29:2)
There seems to be more and more wicked people taking positions of ruler ship in our nation and the world. Globalist seems to have found the perfect vehicle in Covid to make their move on the world, and fulfill their goal to not only lower the world population, but also to fulfill their lust for control-power and greed. It is possible that they are behind the mass disinformation about Covid. Some Medical professionals can’t see any other rational for the massive malpractice orders being uniformly promoted by the medical community, and the aggressive push to force the world to accept a rushed experimental and unsafe shot. A possible prelude to the mark of the beast system. Revelation 13
We as Christians are accountable for any false information we believe and help to spread.
When the Psalmist asked God who would dwell in His tent and live in His holy hill, the answer was:
"One who lives honestly, practices righteousness, and acknowledges the truth in his heart-who does not slander with his tongue, who does not harm his friend or discredit his neighbor" (Psalms 15:1-3) HCSB
Proverbs 12:22 says: "Lying lips are abomination to the Lord: but they that deal truly are his delight." (KJV)
Proverbs 14:5 says: "A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies." (KJV)
Colossians 3:9 says: "lie not one to another." (KJV)
Ephesians 4:25 says: "Since you put away lying, speak the truth, each one to his neighbor" (HCSB)
1 Timothy 2:7
"Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;"
1 John 2:21
"I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth."
Revelation 22:15
"For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loves and makes a lie."
And we certainly are not to lie for profit, like the ungodly, Titus 1:10-11. And our speech is to be sound so that no one can justly condemn us. Titus 2:8.
We are required to provide things honest in the sight of all people Romans 12:17, We are not to be false witness Romans 13:9.
Sadly for many professing Christians, none of these or any other mandates of Holy Scriptures that instruct us in how we are to conduct ourselves in this present world, seem to have any serious meaning. Be that as it may, God will have the last word.
We are instructed by God’s word to stand fast, (1 Corinthians 16:13 Philippians 1:27, 4:1, 1 Thess. 3:8), to live holy (1 Peter 1:15-16). And we must do it no matter how difficult things may get.
I leave you with this final scripture verse, and pray that God will direct your heart.
Matthew 12:35-37
“A good man out of the good treasure of the heart brings forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things. But I say unto you, that every idle word that men (people) shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”
Please feel free to leave a comment or correction. I honestly appreciate actual corrections as they help me to be more accurate and reliable in my reporting.
THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF THE WORLD COMMITTEE ON HEALTH EDUCATION & WELNESS-EXPERT PANEL SESSION September 25, 2021